The Warehouse
Mikhail Epstein
The
warehouse, where all objects are arranged in a particular order, could serve as
a symbol and prototype of world harmony. Everything here is quantified,
distributed according to categories, reflected in lists--the conceptual
hierarchy and classification of things acquires a visual incarnation in space.
Nowhere besides the warehouse could there be such a strict correspondence
between an object's name, fixed on paper, and its real existence. When things
are used--brought in, brought out, set in motion--they cannot be precisely
fixed in idea and word. In the warehouse they acquire a sacred immobility, the
proof of which is the inventory list, where names, unentangled by any
grammatical relationships, stand individually, under numbers, in an immobile
vertical order.
Numeral-word-object:
the ideal correspondence of Pythagorean-Platonic thought. Just as people, in
correspondence with a numerical order, arrange themselves in a queue, so things
are ordered in the warehouse using the same numerical means. Motion is inherent
in people, immobility in things, but in a certain sense one could say that the
line is a mobile image of the warehouse, while the warehouse is the immobile
image of the line. Common to both is the organization of all units, human and
inanimate, in conformity with a sequential number; for, as the Pythagorean
Thilolaeus said, "everything knowable has a number . . . the nature and
the force of the number acts . . . everywhere in all human matters and
relations."[i]
Is
this not the reason that the warehouse acquires a special, highly symbolic
meaning in the Soviet state? Is it accidental that church holdings, having lost
their sacred purpose, were converted into warehouses?
Here
what occured was not the abolition of the holy, but, so to speak, its
replacement. The warehouse is just as ideal an order in the material world as
the church is in the spiritual world. The warehouse is a materalist church, but
instead of collecting people who are seeking in prayer an exalted form of the
soul, it houses a multitude of objects which have found a precise inventoried
form. Both the church and the warehouse are like sealed-off refuges of harmony
in a fallen, sinful world that has been plundered and pillaged. To sin, to
carry off a soul from God—this is stealing, carrying off an object from the
warehouse, from the depository of social property, property as incorruptible
and impervious to mercenary interest as the conscience.
One
of the leading figures in Soviet reality is the warehouseman. Everyone
ingratiates himself with him--not only petty employees, but also bosses and
managers. Everyone must feel his own inadequacy before him, must be tormented
by his own unclean conscience. For the warehouseman stands on the threshold of
the sacred world, separating it from the profane. The managers, in all their
administrative bustle, are on this side, while the warehouseman is on the
other. He is the tsar and the keeper of the immobile kingdom of objects, beyond
the limits of which their harmony can only incur losses, deterioration--in the
hands of business-like and anxious factory managers. Sending an object out of
the warehouse is the same thing as casting it down into dark, sinful,
inconstant earthly life.
This
is why warehouse bolts are so reliable and warehousemen are so severe: they are
guarding our happy future. There eternal abundance and the perfect arrangement
of all things await us. And since we all live and work in the name of the
future, sacrificing our immediate interests to it, the warehouse rank of things
is incomparably greater than their production rank. To store and re-stock
things in a warehouse--do we not here see the highest law of a society which
aims at an ideal future? For where if not in the warehouse is this future already
attained, if for now only in a fenced-off space? This is not yet the fully
transformed world, but a happy forerunner, where things have found their own
measure and number.
The
main thing in socialism, as Lenin taught, is accounting [uchet] and
control [kontrol']. "Socialism means keeping account of everything.
You will have socialism if you take stock of every piece of iron and
cloth."[ii] But this
imperative--"widespread, general, universal accounting and control"[iii]--presupposes
the existence of things in the warehouse: only there can they be completely
"accounted for" and correspond to their exact description.
"Every piece of cloth," taken in the perspective of accounting and
control, no longer covers the body, no longer serves as clothing, is no longer
subject to everyday wear-and-tear, instead being preserved under its inventory
number. All management becomes the warehousing of inventoried things. And the
task is not to get things out of the warehouse, releasing them into a dubious,
wasteful enterprise, but to bring them into the warehouse, distributing them in
their necessary places, in the fullness of control and rational organization.
To the extent that all our life is relocated into the warehouse, and is formed
according the image and model of the warehouse, our happy future will cross
into the present, and the nation, under powerful locks and stern warehousemen,
will begin to live a severe and orderly warehoused life.
But
the problem is that time forces its way even into the eternally peaceful
warehouse. From immobility the stock spoils, rots, rusts. Things which are not
renewed by time grow old from time. And that is why the more the warehouse (sklad) approaches its ideal, the quicker it turns
into a dump, into a cemetery (kladbishche) of untouched things. Touched by no one and nothing, except
time. As soon as the warehouse triumphs in our life, we will find ourselves in
a cemetery, and our warehouseman, like a cemetery watchman, will unlock the
gates himself--there's no longer anything left to take out, anyone to bring it
to, any reason to do it.
1982
Trans.
Jeffrey Karlsen
[i] Antologiia mirovoi
filosofii v 4 tt., vol. 1 (Moscow: Mysl', 1969), 289.
[ii] V. I. Lenin, "Speech
at a Joint Meeting of the Petrograd Soviet of Workers' and Soldiers' Deputies
and Delegates From the Fronts, November 4 (17), 1917," in Collected
Works (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1964?), v. 26, p. 294.
[iii] Lenin, "How to
Organize Competition?", in Collected Works, v. 26. 410.